Amendment to the United States Constitution,
"A well regulated Militia,
being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the
people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
what part of that is not clear and comprehensible to all? The
Anti-Gun Advocates have in the past tried to twist the words and
redefine the definition of the words to mean something completely
different than what these words actually mean. I am speaking
of course the true and traditional definition and not what the
modern day leftist anti-gun advocates would like us to believe they
mean. If there is any confusion as to what these words meant back
at the time the Second Amendment was written and ratified by the
founding fathers, who were there at the time, then I have also included
in the right column some of their Quotes on the subject.
We should not give any consideration to what any of the Anti-Gun Lobby want’s us
to believe these words mean. because just as in a court of law, their
opinions, statements and beliefs are a, "conflict of interest". It
is well known that those of the gun-control advocacy are part of the
leftists whose agenda is to create a society of unarmed and helpless
Those who support the second amendment are the ones who
are advocating a free and independent society. A society where
the people have the rights to not only defend themselves from criminal
elements in our society who would harm them and their family members
but also defend themselves against a tyrannical Government of people
who would rob them of their life, liberty and pursuit of happiness as
well as all of the rights guaranteed in the Constitution and the Bill
I think the people should be armed and that
every man, woman and child of mature age should be knowledgeable of the
safe use of weapons. Exceptions to this of course are those
people who suffer mental disorders and those who are part of the
the years I have watched as some politicians have tried to initiate gun
control and sometimes out right gun bans in the United States.
These political leaders were and still are primarily these who are the
leftists. I have tried to analyze what there true motive is for
this and why they keep gravitating toward this as an agenda. It
is clear to me that these leftists have read the FBI Studies and
statistics that show without a doubt that gun control DOES NOT work in
making our society safer. As a matter of fact gun control does
the exact opposite.
Research has proven time and time again that
private gun ownership and the right to possess them have reduced the
crime rate where ever it was permitted. The statistics have shown
time and time again, those cities and states with gun restrictions have
a higher rate of violent crimes and each year have increased. One
needs only to take a look at Switzerland where laws are clear that
every household must have a gun. Violent Crime, including rape is
almost non existent. Now contrast that to cities like New York,
Chicago, San Francisco and others where strict gun bans exist and are
enforced and you will find crime has been on the rise ever since these
laws have been enacted. From a strictly common sense view, a roving
criminal looking for a home to burglarize will be far less likely to
select a home where the occupants are known or likely to have guns for
protection. Rocket science is not necessary here to figure all
this out. Additionally a community or city where strict gun banns
are well enforced and the law bidding citizens are all known to be
unarmed and helpless, is in fact a criminal's paradise, where the
picking is easy and the victims are abundant.
Now I know
that these politicians are educated and somewhat intelligent.
Some are Lawyers, and some even have impressive credentials and titles
such as Phd's, MBA's, Doctor's of Jurisprudence and all that, so what
would be the true motive behind the gun control and banning of
guns. One has to understand the nature of those who have a
"Narcissistic Personality Disorder" and the nature of the leftists
Certain people in our society who gravitate
to power positions possess this disorder. Psychology is the key
to trying to see through the veils of lies and deceptions.
Everything people do in this world is governed by Psychology and no
matter how twisted there thinking is, a reason for what they do does
exist. Often that reason is not clear, or does not make any sense
but the reasons are always there. There may be reasons that only
make sense to them in there twisted mind. So we are looking
for a motive here that fuels there actions.
First you must never
believe what these people tell you, never believe there false
statistics and out right lies. Follow this rule and it will be
harder for them to mislead you. Secondly when it comes to your
rights, follow the Constitution and the Bill of Rights of the United
States as written by our founding fathers and never negotiate with
people who want to alter these rights or modify these rights by
reducing these rights and you will never be wrong. These rights
can be added to but never taken away or reduced or altered as to take
away these original rights.
founding fathers of the United States had very good reason for creating
the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It is a sacred contract
between a free people and there Government. Disregard these
document and you will inevitably be a slave with no rights. These
rights should never negotiated, ever. In my opinion if a
politician even proposes the altering of even one word of these
documents, it should be grounds for immediate impeachment.
Remember that just like military men, they have take a sworn oath to
protect and preserve the constitution against all enemies foreign and
domestic. In the case of elected officials it may be slightly
different but the essence of the oath is the same. Every school,
college, University, public building, court house and church should
have the two documents on display for the people to see, learn and
understand. If the Government is abiding by these two documents,
then it has nothing to fear from the people.
The first action of
every tyrant that has ever come to this world, be it Hitler, Mussolini,
Stalin, Pol Pot, the list goes on for ever, has first confiscated all
guns from the hands of the people who he sought to dominate and rule
over, every time. This should be your first red flag that pops up
in your mind. If these political leaders do not themselves
embrace the concepts of Liberty, Freedom, Self Governance and man's
nature of self reliance and the ideals of the rugged individualist,
then they are not suited for leadership over anyone. Remember
that with political leaders their true motives will often be hidden and
veiled. A good dose of skepticism is a cure for most of their
lies and deceptions. Remember the old saying of a "wolf in
A tyrant always will attempt to convince you
that the restrictions they propose for you to approve and vote on are always in
your best interest or better yet it is for, "The Children". They will attempt to baffle you with bull
shit and wear you down. If they fail this year to win a majority
vote on slavery, they will be back next year and try again until they
are successful. Personally I thing that any proposal by political
leaders to alter or change to the Constitution and Bill of Rights
should be grounds for immediate impeachment.
Military Men and
woman swear a sacred oath to protect and preserve the Constitution of
the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic.
Political leaders also swear a sacred oath that is very similar.
So it stand to reason that when they propose a law restricting or
altering the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, then they have
already violated their sacred Oath and have also violated the trust of the people
they are chosen to represent. They work for us folks, not the
other way around. Do not forget that and no not ever let them
forget it either and remember the nature of those with a Narcissistic
When I was growing up and in University, I
vividly remember the leftists deliberately confusing the issues by
saying that people should not be able to own guns because, "you do not
need and AK-47 or an AR-15 to go hunting". Well Hunting was never the issue of the Second Amendment, as the Right
to Hunt for your food has always been presumed. The Second
Amendment is there to allow a free people to, by force if necessary,
remove a Tyrannical Government from power, as well as to allow the
citizens the ability to protect themselves and their families.
if you will, a little old lady walking to the corner grocery store to
buy her food for the day. There are no police around, she is a
frail and delicate elderly grandmother and here comes a large brute who
knows she has money in her pocket and has no hesitation in beating her
up and taking her money. Does she not deserve the right to
protect herself? Of course she does and the same applies to your
grandfather who although he was strong in his youth, time and old age
does take it's toll on us all and he is now also frail and would be considered an easy
target for a mugger.
about your daughter, wife, sister,
mother, girl friend or any woman who has a right to be on her way to
work or just going to a park on a sunny day and enjoying the warm
weather, she too would be an easy target for a rapists who might
be twice her size. Does she too not deserve to protect herself
from someone attempting to rape her? Now also conside your wife
going to that same park for the kids to play and there luking in the
bushes is the kidnapper waiting for her and your children. Is it
not her duty to protect her children form the kidnaper?
about all of
our society as a whole, for an example suppose we have one segment of
the population who might be of a different race, ethnic group or
religion and that group intends to annihilate us and take over
the country, do we as a people not deserve the right to protect
ourselves? What would have happened in Lebanon during the Civil
Wars if the Christians Population did not have weapons and had not
Militias? They would have been completely annihilate by the
Radical Muslim Population and would not exist today. Does that
sound rediculous and unbelievable to you? Consider what has
recently happened in Syria and Egypt where unarmed segments of the
population have been targeted and slaughterd simply
because they were Christians. Right here in the United States,
already Jewish People
and White People in various cities through out the USA are being
targeted for assault by roving gangs of African American Youth simply
because they are white or because they are seen wearing a Jewish
Yamaka. The police are unable to prevent it and in most cases the
perpetrators are never identified or prosecuted. Some of those
who were targeted and assaulted were in fact killed, so exactly how
far fetched is my example really?
Responsible people understand that it is a dangerous world that we live
in, and by all accounts it is not getting any safer anywhere or any
time soon. The Leftists who advocate disarming the general public
do not care one slight bit about the safety of you and your
family, me or the average person. The true reason for the
leftists ambitions of an unarmed populous if that the ideology of the
left itself is not that far off of an all out communist state where the
people have absolutely no rights, except those rights granted by the
state itself. Those rights will be granted whenever they
wish and will be just as easily taken always whenever you disagree with
the political power. Eventually the people do open
their eyes up and realize the mistakes they have made by falling for
the ideology of the leftists and the communists and will seek to vote
them out of office. This is simply the reason why the leftist
push for gun control, it is harder to enslave people when they are
armed and willing to rebel tyranny and slavery. As for the police
regarding protection of the general populous, remember this that
although for many of those in law enforcement, yes their higher calling
in life is to be a serve to their communities and to protect the
populous, however that is an exception and not necessarily the
rule. They even have laws enacted that
specify exempt the police from liability regarding your safety and
protection. History also shows us that in the cases where a
tyrannical government came to power, the police were right there, hand
in hand with the tyrannical dictator to
enforce and participate in the tyranny against the people and deprive
them of their
Do not mistake me for anyone who has a grudge against
Law Enforcement nor someone who is an anarchist, as I personally have
generally supported those involved in Law Enforcement. However my
personal loyalty is first to the supreme Law of the Land, The
Constitution and the Bill of Rights. I am all too familiar with
History and Psychology and I know what man is capable of, rather they
have Special Privileges and Powers as a Political Leader or a person
with a Badge. History also reminds us that both of are people
easily corrupted by power over other people. Power Corrupts and
Complete Power Corrupts Completely.
There were also many
people of the leftists who attempted to confuse the true meaning of the
second amendment by implying that the term Militia has a different
meaning that what it really does. They wanted us to believe it
implies a government control over or a government sanctioned group of
armed citizens, but of course we know that is false because the
founding fathers mentioned the possibility of a government of tyrants
who could conceivable take power and rule over the people instead of
representing the people as was designed. Furthermore the historic
definition of the word militia does not support that which the leftist
anti-gun advocates want us to believe.
will close here with
one last comment, "Do not be sheep, led to the slaughter", never trust
the leadership, always be skeptical, always question authority and
remember the old Phrase about, "The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing".
When in doubt consult the Constitution of the United States and
the first ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights.
The Origins of these RightsThe
Second Amendment was based partially on the right to keep and bear arms
in English common-law and was influenced by the English Bill of Rights
of 1689. Sir William Blackstone described this right as an auxiliary
right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense, resistance to
oppression, and the civic duty to act in concert in defense of the
The Founding Fathers Quotes and Comments on the Second Amendment
ask, Sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people. To disarm the
people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them." -
George Mason - Co-author of the Second Amendment
during Virginia's Convention to Ratify the Constitution, 1788
"A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves …"
Richard Henry Lee - writing in Letters from the Federal Farmer to the Republic, Letter XVIII, May, 1788.
"The people are not to be disarmed of their weapons. They are left in full posession of them."
Johnson - Elliot's Debates, vol. 3 "The Debates in the Several State
Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution."
"… the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms"
Philadelphia Federal Gazette - June 18, 1789, Pg. 2, Col. 2
Article on the Bill of Rights
that the said Constitution be never construed to authorize Congress to
infringe the just liberty of the Press, or the rights of Conscience; or
to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens,
from keeping their own arms; …"
Adams - quoted in the Philadelphia Independent Gazetteer, August 20,
1789, "Propositions submitted to the Convention of this State"
The Founding Fathers on Arms
stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are the
American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence … from
the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurences and
tendencies prove that to ensure peace security and happiness, the rifle
and pistol are equally indispensable … the very atmosphere of firearms
anywhere restrains evil interference — they deserve a place of honor
with all that's good."
George Washington - First President of the United States
supposed quietude of a good man allures the ruffian; while on the other
hand arms, like laws, discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in
awe, and preserve order in the world as property. The same balance
would be preserved were all the world destitute of arms, for all would
be alike; but since some will not, others dare not lay them aside …
Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of
Thomas Paine - English-American political activist, author, political theorist and revolutionary
"To preserve liberty, it is essential
that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught
alike, especially when young, how to use them."
Richard Henry Lee - American Statesman, 1788
"The great object is that every man be armed." and "Everyone who is able may have a gun."
Patrick Henry - American Patriot
we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that
we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference
between having our arms in possession and under our direction and
having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the
real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted
with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?"
Patrick Henry - American Patriot
"Those who hammer their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not."
Thomas Jefferson - Third President of the United States
constitutions of most of our States assert that all power is inherent
in the people; that … it is their right and duty to be at all times
armed; … "
Thomas Jefferson - letter to Justice John Cartwright, June 5, 1824. ME 16:45.
"The best we can help for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed."
Alexander Hamilton - The Federalist Papers at 184-8
The Founding Fathers on Maintaining Freedom
"The greatest danger to American freedom is a government that ignores the Constitution."
Thomas Jefferson - Third President of the United States
are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern.
They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters. "
Noah Webster - American Lexicographer
"The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion."
Edmund Burke - British Statesman, 1784
country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from
time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let
them take arms."
Thomas Jefferson - to James Madison
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Ben Franklin - American Statesman
Later Quotes on Gun Control
ruling class doesn't care about public safety. Having made it very
difficult for States and localities to police themselves, having left
ordinary citizens with no choice but to protect themselves as best they
can, they now try to take our guns away. In fact they blame us and our
guns for crime. This is so wrong that it cannot be an honest mistake."
Malcolm Wallop - former U.S. Sen. (R-WY)
"An armed man is a citizen. A disarmed man is a subject."
Seen on a bumper sticker
Pro Gun Control
What is their true motives?
main agenda is to have all guns banned. We must use whatever means
possible. It doesn't matter if you have to distort the facts or even
lie. Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when
those who would resist us have been totally disarmed."
Sara Brady - Chairman, Handgun Control Inc, to Senator Howard Metzenbaum - The National Educator, January 1994, Page 3.
"If you wish the sympathy of the broad masses, you must tell them the crudest and most stupid things."
year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation
has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more
efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!"
Adolph Hitler - Chancellor, Germany, 1933